This is understandable, as it means thinking in terms of the whole image, not the individual pixels or the light intensity per unit area that underpins the f-number/ISO system of exposure (that is specifically designed to work independently of sensor size). The assertion that a smaller sensor sees less total light and is, therefore, noisier (since it receives less light, and hence has a worse signal-to-noise ratio because of shot noise), is contentious. This means they can be smaller, but they still don't get access to that extra light. What about APS-C-specific lenses? Well those simply never project the extra, outer cone of light.
EFFECTS PIXEL SORTER 1 FULL
It's not condensed down onto the smaller sensor (if it were, then you'd still get the same field-of-view), it's just lost.Ģ) That same Full Frame lens on APS-C sensorģ) APS-C-specific lens of the same focal length on APS-C sensorĤ) Full frame lens giving the same field-of-view as the APS-C sensor sees (The 'equivalent' FL lens) The second image shows what happens when you mount that same lens (and hence the same f-number) on an APS-C sensor: the smaller sensor can only see the inner, bronze-colored cone of light, the rest of the original yellow cone of light is no longer available for capture. This diagram represents the light being projected by a full frame lens onto a full frame sensor. Why do you say a smaller sensor sees less light?īecause, with the same f-number, it does. To understand how much total light is available to make up your image, you need to multiply this light per unit area by the area of your sensor.ĭo this and you'll discover that sensor size is much more important than pixel size. We are all here to help and learn together.Īnd, if you really want to get into music visualization.The total amount of light that goes to make up your image is the most important factor in determining image quality.Īs I tried to explain (and demonstrate) in my article on equivalence, f-numbers dictate the light intensity of an exposure (light per unit area). Don't be shocked if you post your masterpiece and people have a few useful suggestions for you. As such, we encourage an atmosphere of helpful critique. This community is meant to be a place of helpfulness. If you are here for a critique of your work Screenshots and/or videos of the thing you want to create It includes things such as:Įxact version of AE you use - not just "CS6" or "CC" or even "CC 2019", but the actual version number (for example, 11.0.4 or 12.2.1 or 13.2.0 or 13.7.2 or 13.8.1 or 17.0.2) However, for useful help, please provide as much info as possible. Once you've gone through that, here are some other helpful resources: A foundation in the basics now will prevent much frustration later. If you'd like to join us on Discord, you can do it here! Are you looking for critiques for your piece or are you showing off someone else's work that you've found that is inspirationally excellent? If you post a video, please explain in the title of your post why you're posting it.
We are not here to be sold to or spammed, so no posting of your AE templates, please. We're here to help with your After Effects problems, critique your pieces, and sometimes provide a spot of inspiration. Don't downvote a relevant submission you simply don't like kindly explain in a comment how it could be improved - anonymous downvotes don't help anybody.